Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- From: Petri Helenius <pete@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:21:50 +0300
Robert Watson wrote:
Actually most em cards support 4096 descriptors each way.
I tend to agree, but implemented full queueing support for if_em to make sure I understood to complexity implications of completely removing queueing from the ifnet side dispatch. I guess an interesting question for us is how we decide what the right threshold is to implement software queuing. Do any if_em cards need software queueing, or do they all have adequate in-hardware queues as is? Entirely cutting the queue code would significantly simplify em_startmbuf.
Pete
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- From: John Polstra
- Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- References:
- RE: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- From: John Polstra
- RE: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- From: Robert Watson
- RE: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- Prev by Date: RE: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- Next by Date: Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- Previous by thread: RE: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- Next by thread: Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model
- Index(es):