Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- From: Scott Long <scottl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:31:20 -0600
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <20060905173334.GH9421@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, John-Mark Gurney writes:
This means that for each call to bus_dma_tag_create, instead of passing
a NULL pointer, you should call bus_get_dma_tag(yourdev) and use that
as the parent tag. I committed some example code to various drivers,
such as ahc, ata, em, and ohci.
If there are never any exeptions to this requirement, why not
pass "yourdev" and have the magic hidden, rather than add 17
ritual characters to the API ?
Drivers can have their own multi-level tag heirarchy. You'd have to
create a new bus_dma_tag_create() variant that expected a device_t
instead of a bus_dma_tag_t. This might be a good idea.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- References:
- Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- Prev by Date: Re: Improvements to gvinum and it's future
- Next by Date: Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- Previous by thread: Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- Next by thread: Re: bus_get_dma_tag now necessary for drivers using bus_dma
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|