Re: superpage plans
- From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:29:52 -0200
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:16:25 +0100
Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what performance impact do you estimate for "older" processors? I know
very little about superpages, so I assume that, e.g., earlier Pentiums
don't support it? Where do you think the break off point lies?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if superpages means using 4 MB TLB pages,
then it is quite old (~1993) and every pentium (i586 or newer) should support
it.
--
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@{gmail.com,wait4.org}>
Powered by FreeBSD
"Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: superpage plans
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: superpage plans
- References:
- Re: superpage plans
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: superpage plans
- From: Ulrich Spoerlein
- Re: superpage plans
- Prev by Date: Proposed change to make -j
- Next by Date: Re: superpage plans
- Previous by thread: Re: superpage plans
- Next by thread: Re: superpage plans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|