Re: a proposed callout API

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <200611292147.kATLll4m048223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Dillon w
rites:

The difference between you and me, Poul, is that you always try to play
cute tricks with words when you intend to insult someone. Me? I just
go ahead and insult them explicitly.

I can do that too: You're a pompous *** who doesn't know what
you're talking about.

Now, does that make you feel better ?

In anycase, I think the relevance of my comments is clear to anyone who
has followed the project. Are you guys so stuck up on performance
that you are willing to seriously pollute your APIs just to get rid of
a few multiplications and divisions?

You have your project and we have ours.

You make your choices, we make ours.

You have your mailing lists, we have ours.

CTRL-D for all I care.

No trying to take sides here, but for us willing to learn here, what
exactly are the problems in Matt Dillon's suggestions? From a novice's
POV, having per-cpu queues looks (emphasis: looks) very scalable and
performant.


_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"