Re: a proposed callout API

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <200612011009.kB1A9VA8064231@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Dillon w
rites:
:
: http://www.ece.rice.edu/~willmann/pubs/paranet_tr06-872.pdf
:
:Robert N M Watson

Oh, that paper. You know, I talked to Alan about that paper a while
back, but it isn't really possible to compare DragonFly side by side
with FreeBSD yet in an SMP environment because we still have a lot of BGL junk in the network path, and because our interrupts are
still going to cpu #0. The code itself is mostly MP safe, and Jeff
has actually turned off the BGL in some of his own testing, but I
can't do it officially yet. In anycase, that is why DragonFly wasn't
used.

So, like, why don't you work on that, instead of annoying us with your
long lectures about how "The World Shall Be Ordered According To Me" ?
Matt,
Ignore Poul-Henning's email on this.. He certainly speaks for
himself but his use of "Us" or "We" doesn't incluse everyone....
some of us ARE interested to hear intelligent comments.


Julian


Poul-Henning


_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"