freebsd-arch

Thread Index

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: John Baldwin
configurable device (and other) tables in the kernel ?
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: Any plans to implement OpenBSD sensor framework into FreeBSD?
- From: Bruno Ducrot
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: Scott Long
Re: Any plans to implement OpenBSD sensor framework into FreeBSD?
- From: LI Xin
Re: Any plans to implement OpenBSD sensor framework into FreeBSD?
- From: Alexander Leidinger
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Any plans to implement OpenBSD sensor framework into FreeBSD?
- From: Volker Theile
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: John Baldwin
vimage and modules
- From: Julian Elischer
Re: carp support into GENERIC
- From: Max Laier
carp support into GENERIC
- From: Corey Smith
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/eli g_eli.c
- From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Re: src/gnu
- From: M. Warner Losh
Re: linux compat layer for device drivers.
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: linux compat layer for device drivers.
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
linux compat layer for device drivers.
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Peter Jeremy
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Peter Jeremy
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Marius Nuennerich
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: src/gnu
- From: Ruslan Ermilov
src/gnu
- From: Rong-en Fan
Re: Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: David Malone
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Peter Jeremy
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: M. Warner Losh
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Chuck Swiger
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Chuck Swiger
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Maxim Sobolev
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Maxim Sobolev
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Rostislav Krasny
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Matthew Dillon
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Luigi Rizzo
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Andrew Pantyukhin
[RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Suleiman Souhlal
Re: siginfo_t.si_code macro constants
- From: David Xu
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: siginfo_t.si_code macro constants
- From: Siavosh Benabbas
Re: siginfo_t.si_code macro constants
- From: David Xu
siginfo_t.si_code macro constants
- From: Siavosh Benabbas
Re: Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Matthew Dillon
Re: Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Matthew Dillon
Re: Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligne d to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: Nick Evans
Optimized copy&move (was: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs)
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Bruce Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Maxim Sobolev
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Mike Jakubik
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Kip Macy
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Baldwin
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Kip Macy
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Kip Macy
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Polstra
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Scott Long
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Nick Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Baldwin
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Baldwin
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Nick Evans
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Polstra
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Polstra
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Baldwin
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Julian Elischer
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
psm(4): Synaptics touchpads initialisation
- From: Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: Ed Schouten
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: John Baldwin
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: John Baldwin
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Request for PTY/devfs changes
- From: Ed Schouten
Re: [ed@fxq.nl: Request for PTY/devfs changes]
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
[ed@fxq.nl: Request for PTY/devfs changes]
- From: Jonathan Dama
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Jon Passki
Re: Any hopes for a BSD for the new Cell Chip?
- From: Ivan Voras
Re: Any hopes for a BSD for the new Cell Chip?
- From: Brooks Davis
Any hopes for a BSD for the new Cell Chip?
- From: Peter Groer II
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: Gary Palmer
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: John Baldwin
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: Milan Obuch
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: M. Warner Losh
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: Ulrich Spoerlein
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Robert Watson
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Ceri Davies
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Colin Percival
Re: usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: Rink Springer
usb modems and com devices into GENERIC
- From: M. Warner Losh
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Robert Watson
Re: default value of security.bsd.hardlink_check_[ug]id
- From: Bruce Evans