Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Polstra <jdp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:24:11 -0800 (PST)
On 16-Jan-2007 Attilio Rao wrote:
The patch:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.diff
The benchmark results:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.benchmark
The kernel options file:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/CURRENT
This is good stuff! I tried your patch on a performance-critical
system that I've been working on. Without going into a lot of detail,
it's a bunch of in-kernel code that blasts packets back and forth
between pairs of gigabit interfaces. Userland isn't involved at
all. Running 4 gigabit ports in this way on a Dell 1950 with 4 CPU
cores running at 3.0 GHz, I got about 4% better performance (in
terms of packets per second) using your patch. That's a pretty good
improvement, considering that the design makes some effort to avoid
lock contention.
John
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Index(es):