Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:51:03 +0100
"Attilio Rao" <attilio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

2006/7/28, Attilio Rao <attilio@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

After some thinking, I think it's better using init/fini methods
(since they hide the sizeof(struct turnstile) with size parameter).

Feedbacks and comments are welcome:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/uma_sync_init.diff

[CC'ed all the interested people]

Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool.
This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is
used into the Linux world for benchmarks, AFAIK.
I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very
interesting, and I think it worths a commit :)
I think that results can be even better on a Xeon machine (I had no
chance to reproduce this on some of these).
(Results taken in consideration have been measured after some starts,
in order to minimize caching differences).

The patch:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.diff

The benchmark results:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.benchmark

The kernel options file:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/CURRENT

For any information, comment, etc. please feel free to contact me.

Attilio


--
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Some preliminary results:

PREEMPTION: 4BSD, Quad P3-Xeon, 2GB ram

pre-patch

1. 176.36 real 703.75 user 0.01 sys
2. 176.73 real 704.34 user 0.03 sys
3. 176.49 real 703.72 user 0.04 sys
4. 175.81 real 701.36 user 0.03 sys
5. 176.57 real 700.98 user 0.02 sys

post-patch

1. 179.17 real 714.39 user 0.01 sys
2. 178.33 real 711.50 user 0.04 sys
3. 178.32 real 711.04 user 0.03 sys
4. 177.34 real 707.51 user 0.03 sys
5. 178.25 real 710.17 user 0.03 sys

_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
    ... Feedbacks and comments are welcome: ... Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. ... This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is ... I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
    ... Feedbacks and comments are welcome: ... Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. ... This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is ... I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very ...
    (freebsd-arch)
  • Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
    ... Feedbacks and comments are welcome: ... Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. ... This program claims to reproduce a real httpd server behaviour and is ... I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
    ... On 1/16/07, Nick Evans wrote: ... > Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. ... > I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very ... > chance to reproduce this on some of these). ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
    ... On 1/16/07, Nick Evans wrote: ... > Even if a long time is passed I did some benchmarks based on ebizzy tool. ... > I think that results of the comparison on this patch is very ... > chance to reproduce this on some of these). ...
    (freebsd-arch)