Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Polstra <jdp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:43:14 -0800 (PST)
On 16-Jan-2007 John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 11:51, Attilio Rao wrote:
The patch:
http://users.gufi.org/~rookie/works/patches/ts-sq/ts-sq.diff
Looks good. Some minor nits are that in subr_turnstile.c in the comment I
would say "a turnstile is allocated" rather than "a turnstile is got from a
specific UMA zone" as it reads a little bit clearer. Also, I would
say "Allocate a" rather than "Get a" for the two _alloc() functions. Also,
why not just use UMA_ALIGN_CACHE and make UMA_ALIGN_CACHE (128 - 1) on i386
and amd64 rather than adding a new UMA_ALIGN_SYNC?
Also, instead of calling bzero in the _init functions, I think you
could pass UMA_ZONE_ZINIT to uma_zcreate.
John
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: Attilio Rao
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|