Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: des@xxxxxx (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:15:00 +0100
Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
This is a different version of the patch I posted here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2006-July/005439.html
Didn't somebody mention ordering issues back then? Your revised patch
still doesn't even try to address those. If we ever get ext3 support,
for instance, mounting an ext2 file system as ext3 might cause it to
be silently upgraded to ext3.
Not to mention the slew of error messages this will result in as you
walk the list of filesystems trying to find the right one...
A better way would be to have a userland utility attempt to identify
the file system, and if necessary load the appropriate module, before
mounting it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
- Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- References:
- [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- From: Craig Rodrigues
- [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Mantaining turnstile aligned to 128 bytes in i386 CPUs
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] mount(8) can figure out fstype
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|