Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:10:23 +0000
In message <20070121140019.A83688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:41:09PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Following recent discussion on alignment of bzero() and bcopy(), I've
added some statistics collecting code to bzero() and bcopy() for
practice (on a RELENG_6 box), and here are the cumulative results for
argument alignment:
i think these profiles depend heavily on the hardware
and usage patterns.
Undoubtedly, but on the other hand, a lot of them operate on
structs and other data laid out by the compiler, so the
unaligned calls are special cases.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
- Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- References:
- Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- From: Luigi Rizzo
- Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- Prev by Date: Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- Next by Date: Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- Previous by thread: Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- Next by thread: Re: bzero & bcopy alignment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|