Re: The Amsterdam Compiler Kit



On 2007-Feb-27 20:11:19 +1100, Petrus <petrus4@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was looking for alternate compilers to GCC a couple of days ago, and
ended up finding the Amsterdam Compiler Kit.
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/tack/)

I recall this from when I was playing with minix.

I adamantly hope that this is something that FreeBSD could eventually use.

Whilst there is some activity on it, the CVS repository contains a
worryingly large number of files that apparently haven't been touched
in more than a decade (some haven't been touched in 25 years). Based
on a quick rummage around the repository, it doesn't appear to support
any current-generation CPUs. The intersection between FreeBSD and
TACK appears to consist of solely of the 80486. (There is also an arm
tree but I don't know enough about the arm architecture to know if a
15 year old compiler is going to work with current chips).

Possibly FreeBSD could eventually use the compiler but it would need a
massive amount of work before it could even support the architectures
that FreeBSD runs on.

That said, the first step would be for someone to create a port of
the compiler. Some of the backends may be of interest to people
doing legacy or embedded work.

--
Peter Jeremy

Attachment: pgpMlRCwqp0Ou.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Relevant Pages

  • Re: New != Faster
    ... The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being ... between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 ... slower disk performance especially under QUOTA. ... My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: difference between c89 and c99
    ... the available compilers in the base system for FreeBSD and wondering at ... is to be compliant with the POSIX standard which mandates that these ... The intent appears to be that c89 invokes a C compiler that complies with ... compiler included in the FreeBSD base system and that is gcc. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: New != Faster
    ... The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being ... between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 ... My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am ... I/O and filesystem I/O. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: New != Faster
    ... The difference in speed is due to the compiler in 4.11 being ... between FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.2 that has been upgraded from 2.9 ... performance this is only because of more more powerful hardware ... Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Which compiler is used for ISO binaries?
    ... I'm currently on freebsd 5.0p4 current or something like ... don't expect too much from simply upgrading the compiler -- ... does anybody have any personal experience with freebsd nfs ...
    (freebsd-questions)