Re: i386?
- From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:19:14 -0700
A) this is not an appropriate forum, see -hackers
B) this misconception has been brought up before please see the archives
The GENERIC kernel needs to be a one size fits all ...
On 5/24/07, johnea <me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Hi,
Don't know if this will make it through your spam filter, or if you'll have
the bandwidth to respond, but here goes.
Why doesn't the FreeBSD project support a 32bit intel architecture newer
than 386?
Pretty much every PC in operation today is at least 686/athalon.
Wouldn't the architechtural improvements to the x86 architecture over the
last 10 years provide performance improvements to FreeBDSD?
Just wondering, couldn't really find a forum to post such a question to.
Thank you for reading my email! And thank you for your hard work on the
FreeBSD project!
And if you have just a minute to craft an answer, Thank you for your reply!
ciao...
johnea
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- i386?
- From: johnea
- i386?
- Prev by Date: Re: i386?
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: Removing file(1)+libmagic(3) from the base system
- Previous by thread: Re: i386?
- Next by thread: FreeBSD/xen structure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|