Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:47:01 +0100
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:24:30PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
ie. exactly the same API as Linux have with the exception of naming them sanely, ie. instead
for example fchownat() we have chownat() because it does not operate on a fd but on a path.
I am not sure about compatibility but we can always introduce a weak reference like fchownat() ->
chownat().
FYI: those names originate on Solaris, and are proposed for an addition
to Posix/SuS. It's probably a better idea to keep them the same on all
operating systems instead of creating articial differences.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Index(es):