Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:38:03 -0700
Roman Divacky wrote:
my current patch is at: www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_at.patch
it does not implement the native fbsd syscalls, only the linuxulator ones
but adding those is a matter of minutes. I asked for a review by pjd and/or
rwatson and hopefully this will get commited soon..
My recollection of the last round of discussion was that you were
asked to implement these in our base, then wrap the linux versions. If
it's trivial to implement, it should probably be done that way first.
I also think you should take the offer collaboration with the Isilon
guys. Getting the benefit of their experience is a good thing. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- References:
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: help on lock around vm_page
- Next by Date: RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Index(es):