Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:
now we need some strong opinion what to do. can anyone step up and tell "do this and
that"? I am willing to adjust my patch with either the wrapping idea and/or the flags thing.
I just need someone to tell me what is the preferred way.
Have you verified that these functions (the way you have named
and implemented them) conform to the draft POSIX spec?
--
DE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: setegid bug
- Previous by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|