Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:56:38 +0200
Roman Divacky <rdivacky@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:56:39PM -0700, Eric Lemar wrote:
Obviously I prefer the wrapping, but I'm just a tad biased :)well.. unless I hear some strong voice to change what I have I am not
changing it. it can always be changed in future.
I would strongly urge you to consider following Eric's suggestion; it is
conceptually far cleaner.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- References:
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- RE: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Eric Lemar
- Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- From: Roman Divacky
- *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
- Index(es):