Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- From: Andrew Lankford <lankfordandrew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:07:02 -0400
Just wondering, but what are the reasons for putting port building options and package system meta data in the /var slice? Maybe I'm just not the sort of FreeBSD user who would see a need to reserve a gigabyte or more for the /var partition, but /var/db/pkg keeps getting larger over successive upgrades even though the rest of /var really doesn't (assuming that programs don't dump all sorts of unclaimed rubbish in /var/tmp). Why not place ports/package info in the same part of the tree where package files typically go, /usr/local?
Andrew Lankford
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- From: Nikolay Pavlov
- Re: Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- From: Andrew Pantyukhin
- Re: Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- Prev by Date: Re: New cpu_switch() and cpu_throw().
- Next by Date: Re: Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- Previous by thread: setegid bug
- Next by thread: Re: Bikeshed: Moving around the var/db/pkg hierarchy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|