Re: file locking.
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:03:18 -0700
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:35:20PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 16 August 2007 04:18:51 pm Jeff Roberson wrote:
Do we have an official stance on libkvm? Now that we have sysctl for
run-time it's only useful for crashdump debugging. Really in most cases
it could be replaced with a reasonable set of gcc scripts.
s/gcc/gdb/. At work we do mostly post-mortem analysis, so having working
libkvm is still very important for us. xref the way I just fixed netstat to
work again on coredumps recently. Breaking fstat on coredumps would probably
be very annoying.
This applies at Juniper as well. I think post-mortem analysis is a Big
Deal(tm) to those developing commercial products based on FreeBSD.
--
-- David (obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: file locking.
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: file locking.
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof of concept: soundcard as console device
- Next by Date: Understanding interrupted system calls
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof of concept: soundcard as console device
- Next by thread: Re: file locking.
- Index(es):