Re: sensors fun..
- From: Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:32:05 -0700
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <47166BA5.1000100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Elischer writes:
Having a userland interface also makes it easier to have backends that are entirely in userland.maybe a loopback filesystem
Just what is it that is so enticing about the kernel ? Why not simply
pass it to a daemon ?
Becuause you can not open and do a directory listing on a process but you can on something that is presented as a file system.
The advantage is that all the heavy lifting is done in user space
and the kernel only supplies a convenient delivery mechanism.
Pipes are also a kernel supplied delivery mechanism but they are not
random access, where a file system is. Otherwise they are similar.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sensors fun..
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: sensors fun..
- References:
- Re: sensors fun..
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: sensors fun..
- Prev by Date: Re: sensors fun..
- Next by Date: Re: sensors fun..
- Previous by thread: Re: sensors fun..
- Next by thread: Re: sensors fun..
- Index(es):