Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:25:31 -0700
On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I think the reason you see such a huge degree of virtualized and
para-virtualized environments these days is simply because service
providers can no longer provide all the web services individual sites
need as a single common set of managed applications.
I thought virtualization was used to address under-utilization of hardware
and to provide better control over usage parameters that may be covered
by SLAs...
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- References:
- kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: James Gritton
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: martinko
- Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- From: Matthew Dillon
- kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- Prev by Date: Re: sensors fun..
- Next by Date: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- Next by thread: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements.
- Index(es):