kthreads, kprocs?
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:36:12 +0200
Hi,
I've seen the cvs notice about kthread renaming to kprocs, and I wonder
why - what's the need for "proper" kthreads and how will it be different
from current implementation of kprocs? Will it mimic userland to form a
"hierarchy": processes have threads? Why, since all the kernel is a
single context wrt memory protection?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kthreads, kprocs?
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: kthreads, kprocs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lock profiling results on TCP and an 8.x project
- Next by Date: Re: Lock profiling results on TCP and an 8.x project
- Previous by thread: Lock profiling results on TCP and an 8.x project
- Next by thread: Re: kthreads, kprocs?
- Index(es):