Re: Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:58:37 +0200
"Kip Macy" <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
What if, rather than putting ifndef XEN in 10 or 15 files, I instead
added "native" to options.i386 and marked all those files as "native"
in files.i386 and then put "native" in DEFAULTS. That would allow me
to simply add "nooption native" in a XEN kernel config and disable
their compilation without touching the files themselves.
or "legacy" perhaps, rather than "native". It would also be useful for
anyone trying to run FreeBSD on a so-called "legacy-free" machine that
doesn't have a PC-compatible BIOS (many thin clients for instance)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- From: Kip Macy
- Re: Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- From: Kip Macy
- Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- Prev by Date: kernel + /dev/console + syslog
- Next by Date: Re: sensors fun..
- Previous by thread: Re: Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- Next by thread: Re: Should Xen be a sub-arch or a build option?
- Index(es):