Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 07:46:50 +0000
In message <20071028074310.233895B3E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bakul Shah writes:
It will be the proverbial camel's nose in the tent. A subset
of C++ is attractive for kernel work but it will be hard to
hold the line at that.
That's one of my main arguments why we should "own the language" we
use.
The other main argument is that we can then teach the language to
do the things we need it to do.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: Garance A Drosehn
- Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: C++ in the kernel
- References:
- Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: Bakul Shah
- Re: C++ in the kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: C++ in the kernel
- Next by Date: Re: C++ in the kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: C++ in the kernel
- Next by thread: Re: C++ in the kernel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|