Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:49:08 -0800
On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Also, and others may want to pipe in on this, it might go in
machine dependent code because it is *theoretically* we could port one day to a machine with an upward growing stack.
This is not theoretical at all: On ia64 there are 2 stacks. One
growing down and one growing up. The downward stack is used for
stack-based variables and the pward growing stack is used by
the processor for stacked registers.
The code suggested will not be meaningful on ia64.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Alexander Motin
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- References:
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Alexander Motin
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel thread stack usage
- Index(es):