Re: RFC: libkse*.a in 7.0

* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [071128 14:09] wrote:
In message <Pine.GSO.4.64.0711281651360.24547@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Eischen wr
ites:

I think we should remove libthr.a, libkse.a and libc.a, so flame on!

I used to disagree, based on arguments about embedded systems.

I may be about to change my mind on this, but won't know for sure
until I get my hands dirty with 7.x on embedded platforms.

I would suggest we put this question on the agenda for 8.x

I think one thing to commit to is to still support static linking,
but just not to have it as the default for our users.

-Alfred
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C++ vs C
    ... >what kind of embedded devices do you have in mind? ... >in mind mainly Pocket PC handhelds with Windows CE and compact .net ... The vast majority of embedded systems use 8 bit processors and have no ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: If not .Net then what?
    ... Bear in mind that this thread is cross-posted. ... especially embedded systems, which might be the *only* software running. ... those females can paste into their horrible Power Point presentations. ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: 16/32 bit processor for OS development
    ... they are suitable for embedded systems. ... you have got to open your mind, tesla old boy! ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: RFC: libkse*.a in 7.0
    ... I used to disagree, based on arguments about embedded systems. ... I may be about to change my mind on this, ...
    (freebsd-arch)
  • Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?
    ... > for smaller embedded systems. ... I disagree. ... feature. ... Steve ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)