Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:16:51 +0100
Quoting Remko Lodder <remko@xxxxxxxxxxx> (from Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:25:30 +0100 (CET)):
On Thu, November 29, 2007 10:47 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote:Quoting Remko Lodder <remko@xxxxxxxxxxx> (from Wed, 28 Nov 2007
22:21:06 +0100):
Dear arch@ members,
I would like to remove /etc/skel from the BSD.root.dist mtree file
since it is no longer being used and I would like to remove unused
items.
Not an objection, just something to think about: Do we want to
deprecate the use of "adduser -k /etc/skel"? I know you said you just
want to remove the directory, and every admin is allowed to create it
again, but by removing the directory from the mtree file, we give a
signal into the direction of deprecation.
You do have a point there actually :-), what we can do in the install
phase (initially "make distribution", later on when the system is already
installed, manage this through "mergemaster") is install all files from
/usr/share/skel to /etc/skel and actually use it.
If we dont want to do that, why should we keep on carrying the directory
then?
I have a local patch to adduser which adds /usr/local/share/skel (so 2 directories are used by default). Now I think it may be better to change this to use /etc/skel instead, and to do it in a way that /etc/skel overrides /usr/share/skel. Looks more usable to me. What do you think?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The most winning woman I ever knew was hanged for poisoning three little
children for their insurance money.
-- Sherlock Holmes
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- References:
- Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- From: Remko Lodder
- Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- Prev by Date: Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- Next by Date: Re: Code review request: small optimization to localtime.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- Next by thread: Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
... I would like to remove /etc/skel from the BSD.root.dist mtree file since ...
installed, manage this through "mergemaster") is install all files from ... adduser
instead. ... Sounds like a quite reasonable argument could be made for having mergemaster
... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
... I know you said you just want to remove the directory, and every admin is allowed to create
it again, but by removing the directory from the mtree file, we give a signal into the direction
of deprecation. ... Sounds like a quite reasonable argument could be made for having mergemaster
install and manage /etc/skel so that when sites customize /etc/skel, mergemaster can be used
to manage those customizations over time. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
... I would like to remove /etc/skel from the BSD.root.dist mtree file ... why you
have these objections so that I can take them into account. ... You do have a point there
actually :-), what we can do in the install ... If we dont want to do that, why
should we keep on carrying the directory ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removal of /etc/skel, your opinions please
... I would like to remove /etc/skel from the BSD.root.dist mtree file ... installed,
manage this through "mergemaster") is install all files from ... mergemaster install and
manage /etc/skel so that when sites customize ... (freebsd-arch)