Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:24:05 -0700 (MST)
In message: <47682ED1.7000702@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
: Robert Watson wrote:
: > buffer, kernel message buffer, kernel configuration (if compiled into
: > the kernel), panic message, and kernel version string. These are
:
:
: Just a sidenote - maybe as part of this change it makes sense to make
: compiling configuration into a kernel opt-out, not opt-in? We are in
: 21st century, nobody really cares about saving few kilobytes of kernel
: memory anymore.
In the embedded world, it matters.
And we already have opt-out. 'include GENERIC; nodev X, nodev Y,
nodev Z'
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- From: Maxim Sobolev
- Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- References:
- DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- From: Maxim Sobolev
- DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- Next by Date: Re: final decision about *at syscalls
- Previous by thread: Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- Next by thread: Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
