Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- From: Andre Oppermann <andre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:19:38 +0100
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function
in my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all
the other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on it.
The only missing parts are some statistics gathering.
Where abouts is this code? A cursory browse through the Perforce web front-end reveals nothing. We're going to start work on the TCP reassembly queue autotuning patch now and if you think we should base it on your new tcp_reass() we need to have a look at it.
The first cut is now at //depot/projects/tcp_reass/ however I made
a mistake when creating the branch and now the code is in the same
changeset as the branching itself. Doesn't make it easy to do a
diff. Have to see how I can fix that. Anyway, have a look and I'm
going to finish/fix the code tomorrow evening.
--
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- From: James Healy
- Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- From: Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- References:
- Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- From: Lawrence Stewart
- Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- Prev by Date: Transport layer congestion control ideas (was Re: Coordinating TCP projects)
- Next by Date: Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- Previous by thread: Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- Next by thread: Re: Coordinating TCP projects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|