Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:35:10 -0800
On Feb 13, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:36:56AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
I personnally think we shouldn't put multibyte-handling inside the
clists, but within the drivers, like syscons.
The problem with doing it that way is that insertion of control
characters, like XON/XOFF or STOP may happen right in the middle
of UTF-8 sequences. This may be problematic...
Technically this shouldn't be a problem, because all subsequent UTF-8 bytes
have bit 7 set and bit 6 cleared and XON/XOFF are 7-bit clean, so it should
be pretty obvious that the handshaking happens in the middle of a multibyte
sequence.
Maybe so, but it wouldn't be a surprise to me that such is
unexpected by UTF-8 parsers and could cause problems, such
as the printing of error glyphs...
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- From: Rick C. Petty
- Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- Next by Date: ln accross ssh
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal for redesigning the TTY layer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|