Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:32:17 -0800
Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote this message on Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 13:12 +0100:
John-Mark Gurney <jmg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I object. I have stated my case. If you don't want to listen to it,
that's fine.
Your case was very unclear. In fact, I would say you objected to
something that you made up in your head which was completely different
from what I actually proposed. Perhaps you should re-read my original
email.
My case is perfectly clear. We already have dev.* for this, and you
want to add a second, confusing, place to put similar/same information...
Yes, this is specific for network interfaces, but what makes a network
interface special that it's configuration can't live in dev.*? You
stated that you were fine w/ some items being in dev.* and others in
net.if.* for the same device, which is why I objected.
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- References:
- dev.* analogue for interfaces
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- From: John-Mark Gurney
- Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- dev.* analogue for interfaces
- Prev by Date: Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- Next by Date: Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- Previous by thread: Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- Next by thread: Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|