cpuset and affinity implementation
- From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:40:31 -1000 (HST)
Please see:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/cpuset.diff
This is unfortunately intertwined with ULE's new CPU selection algorithm so that code is in the patch as well. Otherwise, this includes a simple, ugly userland tool called cpuset and all of the kernel support required. I have tested this by creating sets and subsets and modifying their cpu masks under load. I'm able to dynamically reprovision without issue.
This doesn't have support for jails but the infrastructure is there. It also fails to modify sets if it would leave threads without a valid cpu to run on. I have not implemented a force option but it will be trivial to do so. The initial cpu set is also created before we know all_cpus so it's faked up with all cpus set for now.
I mostly want people to look at the interface in cpuset.h and make sure they agree with it before I start polishing to commit. I'm fairly happy with the way the syscall api looks now. The code itself ended up being much more complicated than I'd hoped due to locking considerations. Try not to look at cpuset_setproc() ;).
If you want to actually try the patch, here's a couple of neat things to do with cpuset:
cpuset -l 0-4 /bin/sh
This creates a new group with a list (-l) of cpus 0-4 inclusive and runs sh in it.
cpuset -g -p <sh pid>
This will get (-g) the mask of cpus pid (-p) is allowed to run on.
cpuset -l 0,2 -p <sh pid>
This will restrict sh to running on cpus 0, 2 while its group is still allowed 0-4.
cpuset -l 0,2 -c -p <sh pid>
This will modify the cpuset (-c) that the sh belongs to.
cpuset -l 0-3 -s 1
This will modify the set (-s) that all threads are in by default to contain the first 4 cpus leaving the rest idled.
Feedback is appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
- From: Nick Evans
- Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
- From: Alfred Perlstein
- Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
- References:
- Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- From: David Xu
- Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Brooks Davis
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Brooks Davis
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Jeff Roberson
- Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- From: Brooks Davis
- Re: Linux compatible setaffinity.
- Prev by Date: Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- Next by Date: Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: getaffinity/setaffinity and cpu sets.
- Next by thread: Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|