Re: cpuset and affinity implementation

Jeff Roberson wrote:


Are there any objections to commiting this functionality in its current form?

I think there is the possibility for further debate and refinement but I believe the code is stable and simple enough to hit the tree for people to start using it.

Thanks,
Jeff

I have no objection, it can be refined later if there is any issue.

Thanks,
David Xu

_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: VP debate already rigged - the fix is in
    ... What, CBS News isn't mainstream ... It didn't hit the news until just before the debate, ... association with Ifill moderating the debate. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: VP debate already rigged - the fix is in
    ... VP debate already rigged - the fix is in Reply ... What, CBS News isn't mainstream ... It didn't hit the news until just before the debate, ... with Ifill moderating the debate. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Fibre Posts
    ... > debate. ... You've hit the nail on the head with that statement. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
    ... of a debate that has spiralled away in some interesting directions. ... Marcus Brigstockes "can we have our planet back" rant on the ... I find Marcus a bit hit and miss, but in this case I think it's ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)