Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:21:22 +0000
In message <47DED21C.4070108@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kris Kennaway writes:
I think this is a great idea, but one of the big problems is probably
going to be dealing with hardware quirks. e.g. we can't even enable
powerd by default because e.g. acpi_throttle hangs on some systems. It
might be tricky to get power management to the stage where it works for
everyone and can be done automatically.
I'd expect that this will improve over time, just like all other
technologies from ISA to PCI bus implementations did.
But yes, it will take time & effort, but given the current
cleantech/greentech buzz, I think we'd better get moving.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- References:
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Prev by Date: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Next by Date: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Previous by thread: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Next by thread: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Index(es):