Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:54:55 +0000
To avoid lots of code duplication I think we would need to provide some sort
of "idle" device support in new-bus. Possibly something like this:
We need different levels of "active" also, EnergyStar requires machines
to reduce ethernet speed from GE to 100M when idle, (this saves approx
2W, 1W in either end of the cable).
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: Joao Barros
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- References:
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Prev by Date: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Next by Date: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Previous by thread: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Next by thread: Re: Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|