Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Christopher Arnold <chris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:15:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <200803302100.m2UL0FTd015654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Dillon wI belive phk means that ggogling for "Flash Adaptation Layer" turns up some results.
rites:
Er, why don't you explain it again, because I can't find the reference.
You'll find it if you search for it.
And no, I really don't want to discuss it any further with you.But please continue the duscussion for the sake of the silent majority, there are loads of us out here who are interested in flash fs development.
Also, i had the impression that newer flash based hardrives had internal logig to spread out writs evenly over the disk and to remap worn out blocks. And that the result of these algoritms increased MTBF to atleast the MTBF for spinning disks. Or have i misread something?
/Chris
--
http://www.arnold.se/
http://www.infotropic.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Prev by Date: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Next by Date: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Previous by thread: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Next by thread: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Index(es):