RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: "Martin Fouts" <mfouts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:34:29 -0700
-----Original Message-----significant
From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:06 PM
To: Martin Fouts
Cc: qpadla@xxxxxxxxx; freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx; Christopher
Arnold; arch@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
But how do you index that information? You can't simply
append the information to the NAND unless you also have a way to
access it. So does the filesystem have to scan the NAND (or
portions of it) in order to build an index of the filesystem topologyin
system memory?
No matter what you do you have to index the information
*SOMEWHERE*.
And NAND devices have a *SOMEWHERE* that makes them different than other
persistent storage devices in ways that make them interesting to do file
systems for.
It's not _that_ you have to scan the NAND, by the way, it's _when_ you
scan the NAND that has the major impact on performance.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Christopher Arnold
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Matthew Dillon
- RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Martin Fouts
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Nikolay Pavlov
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Matthew Dillon
- RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Martin Fouts
- RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Prev by Date: RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Previous by thread: RE: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics
- Next by thread: PAYMENT FORM ATTACHED.
- Index(es):