Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd))
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 06:37:49 +0000
In message <20080527062736.GF64397@xxxxxxx>, Ed Schouten writes:
The new TTY layer should still support line disciplines, [...]
Actually... I think it shouldn't.
With the word `should' I meant that it would still be possible to
implement multiple line disciplines with the mpsafetty code. But I
really think line disciplines should go.
No, don't bother. Remove the entire "abstraction" of linedisciplines.
What should happen with the NETGRAPHDISC?
It should be done in userland if it is necessary at all.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd))
- Next by Date: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd))
- Previous by thread: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd))
- Next by thread: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd))
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
