Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Ed Schouten <ed@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 19:27:00 +0200
* Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Make sure that old binaries that expect the minor number sot be on a
certain format are not broken..
try run some old 2.2.5 binaries in a 2.2.5 jail with /dev mounted and
make sure that things like ptys work.
This should not be a problem. Even though they are called minor numbers,
they must not be confused with the device minor numbers which are shown
in /dev. These are always the same as the inode number of the device.
The minor numbers which are currently being used inside the kernel have
no actual purpose, but are only there to remain compatible with certain
KPI's.
--
Ed Schouten <ed@xxxxxxxx>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
Attachment:
pgprgsoVAIhff.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- References:
- Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Julian Elischer
- Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Next by Date: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Previous by thread: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Next by thread: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Index(es):