Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:33:21 -0700
Ed Schouten wrote:
* Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Make sure that old binaries that expect the minor number sot be on a certain format are not broken..
try run some old 2.2.5 binaries in a 2.2.5 jail with /dev mounted and make sure that things like ptys work.
This should not be a problem. Even though they are called minor numbers,
they must not be confused with the device minor numbers which are shown
in /dev. These are always the same as the inode number of the device.
The minor numbers which are currently being used inside the kernel have
no actual purpose, but are only there to remain compatible with certain
KPI's.
as long as that is proved to be true..
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- From: Ed Schouten
- Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Next by Date: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled
- Previous by thread: Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
- Index(es):