Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- From: John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:05:24 -0400
On Monday 22 March 2010 3:05:12 pm M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <20100322.125937.278730673160410010.imp@xxxxxxxxxx>
M. Warner Losh <imp@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
: In message: <20100322172104.14234yawbsev0sw8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
: : Normally we use MK_xxx for things which are opt-in/opt-out. What about
: : using MK_xxx instead of ENABLE_CTF? If people are in favour of MK_xxx,
: : what should the xxx part look like?
:
: Normally we *TEST* MK_XXX for things which are opt-in/opt-out and
: require the user to say WITH_XXX or WITHOUT_XXX if they don't like the
: default (or want to ensure they get option XXX, even if we turn it off
: by default in the future). The default then gets encoded in
: bsd.own.mk, and permeates the FreeBSD build system since we include
: that everywhere, directly or indirectly.
:
: The problem is that bsd.own.mk is not included in sys.mk, nor should
: it be. That's why we have the hacky combination of WITH_CTF and
: NO_CTF that's there today.
:
: : Is bsd.kern.mk included in module builds too?
:
: Yes.
One last thing I should have said was that the patch that was posted
earlier in the thread looked ok, and likely couldn't be made
significantly better due to the bsd.own.mk issue.
I think the patch is a good approach, I just think it needs to default to not
enabling CTF by default. Instead, various bsd.foo.mk should selectively
enable it.
--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- References:
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review (was: Re: is dtrace usable?)
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: CTF patch for testing/review (was: Re: is dtrace usable?)
- Prev by Date: Re: Increasing MAXPHYS
- Next by Date: Re: Increasing MAXPHYS
- Previous by thread: Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- Next by thread: Re: CTF patch for testing/review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|