Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- From: Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:56:18 -0700
On 6/30/10 2:43 AM, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Le 30/06/2010 05:46, Steve Kargl a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:18:43AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
seen on http://wiki.freebsd.org/ContribSoftware, groff have switch
to GPLv3 license, so,
So what? The version of groff in the src/ isn't
going to suddenly stop working. Please send this
type of email to free-advocacy or freebsd-chat.
It has no place here.
it was just for information and I do not know every dozen freebsd lists
by heart... so I appology.
however, you answer remember me why I quit FreeBSD, cease fire, courtesy
is the key.
Regards,
Cyrille Lefevre
Steve K's social skills leave a bit to be desired, but the question
remains, "is there a good reason to do this?" as a work to gain trade-off, do we get anything we don't already have?
It seems to me that the PWB version is pretty unmaintained. it could of course be because it is now perfect.. :-)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- From: Steve Kargl
- Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- References:
- dwb : groff replacement proposal
- From: Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- From: Steve Kargl
- Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- From: Cyrille Lefevre
- dwb : groff replacement proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- Next by Date: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- Previous by thread: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- Next by thread: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal
- Index(es):