Re: 5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap

From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des_at_ofug.org)
Date: 05/23/03

  • Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: /dev/null panic still alive" 
    To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 21:54:45 +0200

    Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
    > Works for the generic case, but not for this particular example.
    > Just run "shutdown -k now" locally, and watch how funny the login
    > session looks. I don't think we're leaking something here. ;)
    > Hm, or maybe this is just the problem with pam_nologin(8) not
    > respecting the "no_warn" option?

    hmm

    I think you're right - in the nologin case, information leak isn't an
    issue. We should change it to requisite. I need to go through the
    policies and change "sufficient" to "binding" anyway, so I'll take
    care of it once the freeze lifts.

    DES 

    -- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: /dev/null panic still alive"

    Relevant Pages