Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 05/26/03
- Previous message: Scott Long: "Re: SATA and FBSD"
- In reply to: Christophe Zwecker: "Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s"
- Next in thread: Heiko Schaefer: "Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Christophe Zwecker <doc@zwecker.de> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:57:14 +0200
In message <3ED229D6.70901@zwecker.de>, Christophe Zwecker writes:
>P
>>>
>>>Could anyone tell me if this is supposed to be slow like that ? Or is
>>>there anything I missed ?
>>
>>
>> This sounds pretty likely for write performance.
>>
>ok, good to know, just wanted to know if I did everything right. Do you
>think write performance will improve alot or do you focus on other things ?
The primary objective of GBDE was security, and it will always be.
But I try to not totally toast performance :-)
The next leap in GBDE performance will be hardware assisted AES crypto.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Scott Long: "Re: SATA and FBSD"
- In reply to: Christophe Zwecker: "Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s"
- Next in thread: Heiko Schaefer: "Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]