Re: Libthr stable enough for testing
From: John Baldwin (jhb_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 05/29/03
- Previous message: Bryan Liesner: "Re: panic: kern/52718"
- In reply to: Michael Edenfield: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Next in thread: James Tanis: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Reply: James Tanis: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) To: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org>
On 29-May-2003 Michael Edenfield wrote:
> * James Tanis <jtanis@mindspring.com> [030529 17:18]:
>
>> How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is
>> involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr?
>
> That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications
> with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since libthr and libc_r are both 6
> characters long, you could also use ed/sed/etc. to s/libc_r/libthr/ in
> the executable itself.
>
> Also, there is a patch (I think it's still a patch) floating around
> the mailing list archives to use an external config file so you can
> replace the threading library at run-time per-executable.
It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then
setup a libmap.conf.
-- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bryan Liesner: "Re: panic: kern/52718"
- In reply to: Michael Edenfield: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Next in thread: James Tanis: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Reply: James Tanis: "Re: Libthr stable enough for testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
