Re: tunning 5.1
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet (andy_at_siliconlandmark.com)
Date: 07/03/03
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Does newreno work as designed ?"
- In reply to: Danny Braniss: "tunning 5.1"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: tunning 5.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:24:52 -0400 (EDT) To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Danny Braniss wrote:
> i run a small program that writes to file, these are the numbers
>
> Fbsd local disk nfs
> ---- ---------- ----
> 4.8 44.86 42.54
> 5.1 34.37 16.42
>
> are these values (MB/s) acceptable? comments?
> while disk io is less that 30% slower, network is over 60% slower!
Do have any kernel debugging options enabled on the 5.1 install? If so,
the additional sanity checking is what's causing the discrepency.
Regards,
> Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Does newreno work as designed ?"
- In reply to: Danny Braniss: "tunning 5.1"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: tunning 5.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
