Re: /dev/shm
From: Marcin Dalecki (mdcki_at_gmx.net)
Date: 07/07/03
- Previous message: Peter Holm: "LOR in vm/swap_pager.c:1166 + vm/vm_kern.c:325"
- In reply to: Thomas Dickey: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Thomas Dickey: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Terry Lambert: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:35:21 +0200 To: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:23:25PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>You know that file system name lookup is one of the most
>>expensive system calls under UNIX?
>
>
> stating the obvious is a clumsy rhetorical ploy (asking for agreement without
> making a point).
The point is that this is one of the reasons why the top command in
question takes a lot of relative CPU time under Linux. Some
"faster" versions of procps utils try to cache data but the trade off
is simply the fact that the results are not 100% accurate.
I tought this was obvious?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Peter Holm: "LOR in vm/swap_pager.c:1166 + vm/vm_kern.c:325"
- In reply to: Thomas Dickey: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Thomas Dickey: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Reply: Terry Lambert: "Re: /dev/shm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]