Re: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release]

From: Lukas Ertl (l.ertl_at_univie.ac.at)
Date: 07/16/03

  • Next message: Tinderbox: "[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98"
    Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:26:58 +0200 (CEST)
    To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
    
    

    On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

    > Now after resetting the machine which was hung by "sysinstall" it claims
    > that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5" disks" was absent (see dmesg below)
    > Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is
    > definatley not) and allows me to select "continue boot"

    Did you try to replace that defective drive?

    > That's what I do and after kernel probing the machine reboots with the
    > folowing error (well, this takes some time to typewrite it from my monchrome
    > screen):
    >
    > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
    > fault virtual address = 0x10
    > fault code= supervisor read, page not present
    > instruction pinter= 0x8:0xc014a0a6
    > stack pointer= 0x10:0xcce65bd8
    > frame pointer= 0x10:0xcce65c58
    > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff type 0x1b
    > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
    > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0
    > current process = 4(g_down)
    > trap number = 12
    > panic: page fault
    >
    > Then it reboots!

    Can you get a coredump and a backtrace? That would be very helpful in
    debugging.

    > Now please give me a hint what to do. This is my brand new fileserver which
    > collected all improtant data from the last decade and since it's brand new I
    > didn't manage any backup.

    Funny, there's always an excuse why there are no backups.

    > When testing the hardware (unplugging one drive while the machine was
    > running) I had the same error but I thought that would never happen under
    > normal circumstances.

    Well, if you did run tests and saw the errors, why did you think it
    wouldn't happen "under normal circumstances"?

    IMHO it would be better if you start over with a clean machine and two new
    disks. Sounds very much like you damaged the drive.

    regards,
    le

    -- 
    Lukas Ertl                             eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at
    UNIX-Systemadministrator               Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
    Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID)       Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
    der Universität Wien                   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Tinderbox: "[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98"

    Relevant Pages

    • Saving Fax Console to reinstall after a full wipe restore
      ... to paste-overwrite back into the renewed windows installation. ... to Full backup vs Full image. ... 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache ... Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
    • Re: Backup/Restore program (s), etc/misc info;
      ... to Full backup vs Full image. ... 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache ... Network Drives: ... Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
    • Re: 306GB drives!
      ... > the associated controller modules can be upgraded cleanly while the ... of our restores are done from the spindles, not the tape. ... mention that we keep up to 1 to 2 weeks worth of backup ONLINE. ... to tell your client that you can restore their database from tape, ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: Saving Fax Console to reinstall after a full wipe restore
      ... I've never managed to restore my old fax msg store in three ... separate backup apps, one of which is bound to work (and has proved to ... 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache ... Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
    • Re: fictional faulty pc with data on it legal question
      ... If my PC breaks down within the warranty period I have no choice but to send it back to the shop (in this case Dixons). ... I imagine a situation where the fault prevents me accessing my data and where I have several thousand photos, personal emails, business accounts etc, stored on the hard drive. ... I have known places that dutifully did a regular backup every Friday only to find that the backup data could not be read back when they encountered a catastrophic systems failure. ... They probably can't be bothered taking more than a cursory glance at recent cache history - and it would be hugely irrelevant if the fault was a hard disk failure. ...
      (rec.photo.digital)

    Loading