Re: still data corruption with 5.1-R on Intel Pentium 4

From: Andre Guibert de Bruet (andy_at_siliconlandmark.com)
Date: 07/24/03

  • Next message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: Buildworld /rescue failures in 5.1"
    Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
    To: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <g.w.k@web.de>
    
    

    On Wed, 24 Jul 2003, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:

    > There have been threads about data corruption in RAM on P4 and other
    > i386 machines on this list. I also observed the problem, on my laptop
    > with 5.0-R. It seemed to go away with 5.1-R, on the laptop.
    >
    > Recently I upgraded my home PC which is a P4 2.0A from 4.8-R to 5.1-R.
    > No problems at first.
    >
    > Until I ran "portsdb -Uu". I got a couple mysterious SIG4 and SIG11.
    > Just to be sure I rebooted and tried again, same result. I rebooted
    > another time, this time with ACPI disabled, and tried again, still the
    > same.
    >
    > Then I rebuilt my kernel with options DISABLE_PSE and DISABLE_PG_G, as
    > suggested by Terry in the old threads: Bingo, everything is fine now, no
    > more SIG4 or SIG11 during portsdb -Uu.
    >
    > It seems the workarounds that we have in 5.1-R are not effective enough.
    > What do you think?

    DISABLE_PSE and DISABLE_PG_G fixes all of the machines that I've seen with
    random segvs (And for the record, they've all been Pentium 4s).

    I find it ridiculous that chip vendors require NDAs to find out about
    _faults_ in the chips they've sold you. It's bad enough that these faults
    made it through QA and they're not offering replacement chips, but not
    allowing information about the problem to circulate so that appropriate
    workarounds can be made is immoral.

    My thoughts,
    Andy

    > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
    > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: Buildworld /rescue failures in 5.1"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Quiz / Quote this job
      ... (I've just now added a copy of his original multiple choice list). ...    Less than 35 Seconds ... on several machines was a Clean-up Kid. ... stopping the machines and clean out chips and dump chip hoppers so ...
      (alt.machines.cnc)
    • Re: Another use for a Plus 4
      ... to fail thus rendering the machine inoperable (I've had two die on me ... Luckily, back in my chips collecting days, far behind ... machines than I have. ... think for the Argentinian version of the Plus/4. ...
      (comp.sys.cbm)
    • Re: Another use for a Plus 4
      ... to fail thus rendering the machine inoperable (I've had two die on me ... Luckily, back in my chips collecting days, far behind ... machines than I have. ... think for the Argentinian version of the Plus/4. ...
      (comp.sys.cbm)
    • Re: Flycutter arrived
      ... I rely on air for moving chips off my machine. ... Air was always on machines in any job I held, and certainly has been on my machines as long as I've owned them. ... I have a Ridgid shop vac that probably dims _your_ lights when I turn it on:) It does a nice job of getting chips out of my way. ...
      (rec.crafts.metalworking)
    • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
      ... > Oh well, as a computer architect I don't need all the details, just ... Individual memory modules (chips) ... Modern machines aimed at processing sound find 24 bits processors ... A 12 by 12 bit multiplier produces 24 bits of output, ...
      (sci.crypt)