Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 07/26/03
- Previous message: Steve Kargl: "Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Next in thread: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Reply: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:00:40 -0600 (MDT) To: morganw@chemikals.org
In message: <20030726.103846.20535602.imp@bsdimp.com>
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: The reason I keep saying that is that nobody knows for sure. Nobody
: has reverse engineered anything, got sued and won (or lost). Just
However, there are one or two cases that are close to relevant working
their ways through the courts. Since they are in different districts,
the answer is different depending on where you live in the US.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Steve Kargl: "Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Next in thread: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Reply: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
